Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×


Join Truck Conversion Today
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 02-07-2004, 01:36 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 748
Default

I've read a little about the class 8 motorhomes and maybe someday I will be able to afford one. Until then, I really enjoy admiring trucks owned by others...

My question is: Why aren't cabovers used as much as conventionals when building a motorhome? I know the cabs have to tilt to gain access to the motors, but with some removable panels and a good sealing boot between the truck and the home portion, that issue could be solved.

I've also read that the cabovers ride rougher than the conventionals but have read you can soften their rides and their forward views have to be superior to the conventionals right?

Anyhoo, could somebody comment about the cabover versus the conventionals when building motorhomes and why they aren't used?

I see so much benefit from putting the driver closer to the front bumper. That would increase living space aft of the driver seats yes?

Thanks.
__________________

BravestDog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2004, 12:25 PM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 80
Default

Well you cited a couple of the issues with them. Ride being a significant issue. The mechanics of making the cab accessable from the living space are probably fairly tricky. On the positive side you can get superior manueverability out of a cabover. You could just not connect the cab and just run an intercom. Most women probably would prefer not to have to climb into a cabover and it is tough to arrange the sleeper section so that you can have more passengers up there comfortably. On the other side you can get good ones cheap. They are not being sold much anymore. Freightliner was totally COE till the mid 70's. If you crack the code and come up with a way to make it work, more power to you.
Kevin

2k PSD F-250 dually conversion
Alpenlite Durango Camper
Thinking Retro - Needlenose Pete KW or early Freightliner Conventional - Pre Diamler Benz
__________________

kblackav8or is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2004, 11:49 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 201
Default

They are ugly.
Patrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2004, 07:39 PM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 8
Default

Please, Patrick, tell us how you really feel!
Vicki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2004, 08:01 PM   #5
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Urbana,Illinois heading tor St. Louie
Posts: 89
Default

that would be U G L Y
ugly is only skin deep but U G L Y is to the bone
5erFool (John) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2004, 12:04 PM   #6
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'm thinkin' maybe a 70's model GMC Crackerbox with a nice box on the back.....


318 Detroit and a 13 spd.........


Retro........and
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2004, 06:29 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2
Default

I'm also interested in the cabovers because I want to build a 40' box to go behind the cab and still stay inside most length laws. Any more advise? Cowboy cadilac has said they have a kit I can install myself is this a viable possibility?
__________________

Dennis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
×