Join Truck Conversion Today
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 09-05-2009, 11:07 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Dodger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fort Campbell
Posts: 118
Default

Ok, when I say simple I do not mean I am not diesel smart. I mean, what year did International put a computer on their 4700 series trucks? I do not want a truck with a computer, I would prefer a fully mechanical engine (ease of roadside repair) . I am either going to get a 4700 or a F700/800 Ford crew cab. So now the question is best engine and manual transmission combo for a class 6 size truck. Any suggestions? Thanks,

Dodger
__________________

__________________
1994 International 4700 powered by a DT360 (5 years and still working on it)
1990 Ford Bronco II
Dodger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 07:40 PM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 5
Default

Hi Dodger,
For my $.02, I suggest you look for a Cummins engine. You'll want the 5.9L, 8.3L, or the (if memory serves) big 10L. The older ones have no computer, are dead simple, and rugged as a granite boulder. You want the inline bosch P injection pump on the smaller 2 and the PT pump on the big one. All 3 can be tailered to your power needs, or wants, easily and fairly cheaply.

Hope this helps a little.
__________________

DieselJake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 05:47 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 625
Default

....ELECTRONIC PARTS ARE VERY DURABLE....I wouldn't worry about that end of things.....the whole world is changing........geofkaye
geofkaye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 07:21 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Bob86ZZ4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 1,814
Default

I'm with Geofkaye here. Scary tho. I used to prefer the older allegedly less complicated stuff. But, the new engine management is the only way to go. At least that's how I fell about small block Chev's. It's just so much better than an old carburated engine. In all ways. I don't know anything about truck motors. But, I have two friends that are heavy truck mechanics. They will tell you the newer computer managed engines are much better in almost every way than an older engine. Sure, you might have to spend a few bucks for some diagnostics if you do get a code. But, it would likely be cheaper than hunting down a problem with an older engine that won't tell you what it's mad about. I would also hazard a bet that the newer the engine the better it's made. Generally speaking anyhow. I'd stop at some truck repair places when the guys (mechanics that is) are sitting outside on the wall during lunch break. Pick their brains about your concerns. They'll be the best resource I would bet. Real world experience, no substitute for that.
__________________
'03 Freightliner FL112, 295" wheel base, with '03 United Specialties 26' living quarters, single screw, Cat C12 430 h/p 1650 torque, Eaton 10speed , 3.42 rear axle ratio
Bob86ZZ4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2009, 07:39 PM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Jackson, Missouri
Posts: 29
Default

The older non-computerized 5.9L Cummins will get better fuel economy. 98.5 started with the computer. We've had 97 to 06s and the 97 would get better fuel economy. Of course, the 06 sure runs good with a smarty computer upgrade!
HawkEng is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.